System.Threading.SemaphoreSlim.Wait C# (CSharp) Method

		public void Wait ()
		{
			CheckState ();
			do {
				int result = Interlocked.Decrement (ref currCount);
				if (result >= 0)
					break;
				
				// We revert back the operation
				Interlocked.Increment (ref currCount);
				while (Thread.VolatileRead (ref currCount) <= 0) {
					wait.SpinOnce ();
				}
			} while (true);
		}
		

        public void ExtremeDisposal()
        {
            using (var context = CreateContext())
            {
                Assert.AreEqual(-1, context.Publisher.MySettings.MaxConnectionRetry, "For this test, we want the worst situation");

                context.Publisher.Start(0);
                Assert.IsTrue(context.Publisher.Started);

                var message = new byte[] { 0, 1, 1 };
                var connectionFail = new SemaphoreSlim(0);
                context.Model.Setup(m => m.BasicPublish(It.IsAny<string>(), It.IsAny<string>(), context.Publisher.Props, message)).Throws(new Exception("I don't want your message anymore"));
                context.Connection.Setup(c => c.CreateModel()).Callback(() => connectionFail.Release(1)).Throws(new Exception("And I don't want to accept your connection either"));

                context.Publisher.Publish("test", message);

                /* The way callbacks are implemented on exception throwing mocks does not garantee
                 * that the callback is called "after" the exception is thrown.
                 * If we wait for two, we are sure at least one has been finished !
                 */
                Assert.IsTrue(connectionFail.Wait(1000));
                Assert.IsTrue(connectionFail.Wait(1000));

                context.Publisher.Dispose();
                context.Publisher = null; //to avoid the double dispose of Publisher
                //The real test here is that eventually the Dispose method returns
                Assert.Pass();
            }
        }